Climate News Network

Paris deals crushing blow to coal

December 19, 2015, by Paul Brown

Investors are being warned to steer clear of coal because assets could be left stranded in the ground. Image: Alexander G via Flickr

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

As worldwide demand for coal stalls, some experts believe the industry is now in such dire straits that it won’t be able to compete with renewables in future.

LONDON, 19 December, 2015 – After a decade of aggressive growth in demand, the market for coal has stalled and is unlikely to recover, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

Its report on the medium-term coal market says that demand in China − which uses 50% of the world’s coal − has begun to fall. And while other growing economies such as India will use more, this will not make up the difference as worldwide demand will level off over the next five years.

But the outlook for coal could be even gloomier than the IEA suggests. Its report was written before the outcome of the Paris Agreement on climate change, which led to some of the largest coal users vowed to cut their carbon dioxide emissions much further than many had predicted.

Other commentators believe that not only has global demand for coal already peaked, it will begin a steep downward trend, leaving most of the world’s coal in the ground.

Bleak outlook

The US-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis believes the outlook for coal is bleak. It says the Paris Agreement will accelerate the trend away from fossil fuels − and particularly coal − towards renewables, storage of energy and energy efficiency.

Its report talks of declining demand, excess supply, under-utilised rail and coal export terminals, excessive borrowing by companies, and stranded assets of coal still in the ground leaving losses for shareholders.

“India’s coal imports have halved in the month of November 2015. Coal imports into China
are down 30% year on year in 2015”

Tim Buckley, IEEFA’s director of energy finance studies in Australia, said: “The global coal trade is in dire straits. India’s coal imports have halved in the month of November 2015. Coal imports into China are down 30% year on year in 2015.

“The collapse in the two largest coal import markets over 2015 clearly explains why coal company share prices and the traded price of coal have both continued to decline, and the forward market suggests this trend will continue to at least 2021.”

While the focus of both these reports is the potential coal consumption in Asia, both agree that there will be a continual decline in coal use in both the US and Europe. Coal consumption in the US is down 10% in 2015, largely replaced by shale gas. In Europe, it is the increase in renewables that is damaging coal demand.

This weakness in the industry is seriously affecting the share price of major coal companies, particularly in the US, where many city analysts are warning their investors to steer clear of coal, predicting more bankruptcies in the industry in 2016. Many major companies were already struggling to survive before the Paris Agreement, and stocks have dropped further since.

Reduce pollution

The IEA report, while not so pessimistic, says that coal demand will continue to be constrained because of China’s wish to reduce pollution and to ensure rapid expansion of hydro, nuclear, wind and solar power. It notes that while China’s growth has slowed, its energy efficiency has risen, reducing further the demand for coal.

Across the world, the IEA says, if the coal industry is to survive and prosper, then governments and the industry itself must concentrate on bringing forward the technology for carbon capture and storage (CCS) from coal plants.

Progress in this area was far too slow, and unless the coal industry speeds up development it could be too late – because other technologies will already have replaced coal.

The IEEFA view is that CCS technologies, if they can be developed at all, will make coal plants much more expensive.

This means that the energy produced from these plants will no longer be competitively priced compared with renewables such as wind and solar, which IEEFA says are already at or close to price parity in India, one of the biggest remaining potential markets for coal. – Climate News Network

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
1 comment Show discussion Hide discussion
  • Some notable coonsulincs:1. Check out the slope of the increase in clean energy production. French nuclear energy program ran from about 1975 to about 1990; the German & Danish renewable energy programs started in around 1990.2. The lower graph shows that nuclear leads to lower per capita emissions compared to renewables push both when electricity demand grows very significantly (see France vs. Germany) and when electricity demand stays almost stable (contrast Sweden and Denmark).3. The results, i.e. CO2 emissions per capita, show that France and Sweden are at or below Chinese levels even when using much more energy.4. In the end, it really matters how we produce energy. This holds irrespective of whether one thinks the French/Swedish consumption patterns are unsustainable or not; even then, they manage to produce their energy with considerably smaller environmental footprint*.* Disclaimer: I’m well aware that CO2 emissions do not capture the entire environmental footprint. However, other sources and some years spent evaluating environmental footprints lead me to believe that the footprint from French/Swedish solution is significantly lower than that from the German/Danish one.

Add a comment