Climate News Network

Past emissions cause mounting climate havoc

March 25, 2016, by Alex Kirby

Australian scientists measure plants’ GHG emissions and absorption.
Image: CSIRO

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Despite signs that the world will cut its future fossil fuel use, greenhouse gases already emitted are still driving accelerating climate change.

LONDON, 25 March, 2016 – Climate change has reached the point where it may outstrip the quickening efforts to slow it by reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, scientists say.

They say humans are now releasing CO2 into the atmosphere 10 times faster than natural processes have ever done in the last 66 million years, before the extinction of the dinosaurs.

The disclosure comes in the World Meteorological Organisation’s State of the Climate report, published in the journal Nature Geoscience

The lead author, Professor Richard Zeebe of the University of Hawaii, said: “Our carbon release rate is unprecedented over such a long time period [and] means that we have effectively entered a ‘no-analogue’ state.

“The present and future rate of climate change and ocean acidification is too fast for many species to adapt, which is likely to result in widespread future extinctions.”

“The window of opportunity for limiting global temperature rise to well below 2°C . . . is narrow and rapidly shrinking. The effects of a warming planet will be felt by all”

The UN secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, said: “Climate change is accelerating at an alarming rate. The window of opportunity for limiting global temperature rise to well below 2°C – the threshold agreed by world governments in Paris in December last year – is narrow and rapidly shrinking. The effects of a warming planet will be felt by all.”

The WMO secretary-general, Petteri Taalas, said the present “alarming” rate of climate change as a result of greenhouse gas emissions was “unprecedented in modern records”. “The future is now”, he said.

Yet less than a week ago the International Energy Agency announced that global energy-related emissions of carbon dioxide had shown no increase for the second year in a row. The announcement was widely hailed as significant good news, with the IEA’s executive director, Fatih Birol, describing it as “yet another boost to the global fight against climate change”.

Advocates of a low- or no-carbon economy have been encouraged by other evidence that the world has begun in earnest to switch away from fossil fuels and the greenhouse emissions which they cause.

They point to the Paris Agreement itself, to the rapidly falling price of solar energy and other renewable sources, and to the shrinking market for coal, the most polluting of the fossil fuels.

Damage inevitable

But the WMO report spells out starkly one inescapable reality. The world may now be intent on cutting future greenhouse gas emissions in order to prevent climate change reaching levels beyond human ability to affect. But the emissions which have already reached the biosphere are long-lived, and they may persist long enough to damage the natural world irreversibly, no matter what we do now.

The WMO’s evidence suggests that massive damage is indeed inevitable. Among its findings are:

  • 2015 was the hottest year on record, because of long-term climate change and a strong El Niño;  
  • devastating heatwaves were widespread and sea levels were the highest recorded;
  • more than 11 months’ rain fell in one day in Libya, and more than 13 months’ worth in a single hour in the Moroccan city of Marrakech.

The world can slow or possibly even stop future greenhouse gas emissions. It has to live with the consequences of those that are already in the atmosphere and the oceans. On the WMO’s evidence, that may be the harder part. – Climate News Network

Print Friendly
3 comments Show discussion Hide discussion
  • “Texas A&M researchers modelled all the projected growth in global population and per capita energy consumption, as well as the size of known reserves of oil, coal and natural gas, and greenhouse gas emissions to determine just how difficult it will be to achieve the less-than-2 degree Celsius warming goal.

    “It would require rates of change in our energy infrastructure and energy mix that have never happened in world history and that are extremely unlikely to be achieved.

    “Just considering wind power, we found that it would take an annual installation of 485,000 5-megawatt wind turbines by 2028. The equivalent of about 13,000 were installed in 2015. That’s a 37-fold increase in the annual installation rate in only 13 years to achieve just the wind power goal,” adds Glenn Jones, co-author with Kevin Warner.

    Similar expansion rates are needed for other renewable energy sources.

    Every hour of every day:
    • 3.7 million barrels of oil are extracted from the Earth
    • 932,000 tons of coal are removed from Earth
    • 395 million cubic meters of natural gas are removed from Earth
    • 4.1 million tons of carbon dioxide are put into the Earth’s atmosphere
    • 9,300 more people inhabit the Earth

    The 21st Century Population-Energy-Climate Nexus
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516300830

    No Soil & Water Before 100% Renewable Energy
    lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/no-soil-water-before-100-renwable-energy

  • “Despite signs that the world will cut its future fossil fuel use”

    what signs are these? i see human animals continuing to breed with no regard to planetary limits. no one is reducing their consumption. even my “good green” friends are still traveling by air, eating at the top of the food chain and living on 25 to 30+ tons of carbon a year!

  • “Despite signs that the world will cut its future fossil fuel use”

    The text agreed at the UN climate conference in Paris last December (the “Paris Agreement”) provides no such sign. The reality is that the developing countries (responsible for at least 70% of greenhouse gas emissions and comprising about 80% of the world’s population and virtually all its poorest people) are exempted from any obligation to take action to cut their fossil fuel use.

    The Paris Agreement was adopted “under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” (the UNFCCC) by which (Article 4.7) developing countries are expressly authorised to give overriding priority to “economic and social development and poverty eradication” – even if that means increasing emissions. And that was reinforced by Article 4.4 of the Paris Agreement that restricts “absolute emissions reduction targets” to the developed countries whereas developing countries are required only to make voluntary “mitigation efforts”.

    The distinction between developed and developing economies has plagued international climate negotiations for about twenty-five years. The UN conference in Copenhagen failed to resolve the matter and it was hoped that Paris would do so. Unfortunately it didn’t – and it’s hard to see what mechanism might change this now.

Add a comment